Patriotic Grace


So, I’ve heard about this book from a variety of places and I decided to buy it yesterday. And I finished it this morning. I think Noonan was a speech writer for Ronald Regan and now writes for the Washington Post. It was really insightful and really made me think about what is necessary – what we have to do as the people of the United States of America to move forward.

Much of her argument is that we had the opportunity to really come together as a nation after 9/11, and for a while we did and we saw in the midst of one of our greatest tragedies our greatest glory. We helped one another out. We demonstrated what Americans were about. And we promised to never forget.

But she talks about actions in the years since then – and some of it she places on carelessness within the administration, but also in the fingerpointing of congress – that have ripped our nation in two. Her book is called patriotic grace because she believes we need to find the maturity and grace to not only listen to and treat others with respect, but also have the grace enough to ask for help when we need it.

I want to post a few thoughts on particular sections of the book in the next week or so, but at least want to get my ideas started.

Have you read the book? What are your thoughts?

too much information

, pI just realized that there may actually be too much information going on in this election cycle. We have at least three 24 hour cable news channels. and 3 major networks, + the public network. And how many newspapers and columnists? And how many bloggers? and how many special interest groups? not to mention the campaigns themselves.

I recently sent a 6 page email to my mom in response to her request for reasons why I support Obama. And she sent me back 11 pages of why she disagrees. And in many cases, I have realized that we have different information and that we have different facts. And that all of those facts and information are spun in completely different ways depending on which candidate you are looking at.

It is simply overwhelming. I didn’t do a lot of citation of sources and to be honest most of my thoughts in my first email were more ideological, so now I’m trying to figure out how much time and effort I want to spend fact checking and searching out the information I was referring to. It is really and honestly very exhausting.

And what I have realized is the biggest part of how we read all of this information is based on perception. What sources do we percieve to be most relevant? Which do we percieve to be most accurate? less biased? who is more truthful? One of her biggest struggles has been the truthtelling from the Obama camp – so will she believe any of the facts I share? On the other hand, I find many of the ads and the stump speeches from the McCain side to be dishonest. There is so much grey area and each candidate is working as hard as they can to paint the other person in the worst light and they will twist any word or phrase they can to do so.

So even information and facts have to be distilled and researched and examined to find out what was the context, what was the background. And I just don’t have the time of day to fact check every single sentence that each candidate and their running mate says. I’m exhausted just thinking about it. Politics, if anything, has served to further divide and hurt us. It pits us against one another. It makes us suspicious. And because there is so much freakin’ information out there, the question really is whether any of us will ever again be able to make an informed decision.

McCain vs. Obama

A friend of mine did this comparison herself following the debate last night, and I thought it was a good idea. I wanted to comment on hers, but rather than hijack her own thoughts, I thought it would be constructive to make my own response.

I wonder sometimes though how already being a decided voter flavors the way that we hear and respond to such debates…

The Bailout Plan:
I don’t think that either of them really said much of anything new or comforting. Neither seemed to really be able to explain to the American public what was going on or why the bailout was needed. It seems that the problem is everywhere from the mortgage crisis to a helping hand to wall street – but the real problem is that everything is intertwined and a piece of it all stopped working last week. Listen here for the best and only real explanation of the crisis that I have heard that makes sense

Obama had the edge in that he got to answer first. He stated four clear points. McCain basically reiterated those same four points, with a few exceptions. It is hard to think about McCain really wanting to go for it, based on his history of deregulation.

I was disappointed that neither directly answered Jim Lehr’s question about what priority would have to go. At least not at first. When McCain finally said he would impose a spending freeze, I thought Obama’s response that a spending freeze takes a hatchet to a problem that requires a scalpel was very on point.

McCain – C, Obama C+

Taxes and Earmarks:
I really don’t care that much about earmarks. Well, I do and I don’t. The truth is that our representatives don’t get re-elected unless they do something to help out the folks back home. And that is a good chunk of what earmarks are… I’ll pat your back, if you’ll pat mine. Some things just wouldn’t ever get through Congress on their own. I understand this from working in the legislative process at my own Annual Conference. I had an amendment to be made, someone else standing at the same mike had a different one, and we both realized that alone, neither would have the time to get through. So we sat down together and combined them into one amendment and voila – problem solved, we both got to be happy, and I think, everyone was better off.

If fighting earmarks and reforming washington is McCain’s #1 goal – couldn’t that best be done from a seat in the Senate? I guess the piece I don’t understand is why he think that being President is going to give him the ability to really enact that type of reform.

I also don’t agree with any of McCain’s tax plan. Those who make the most (often at the expense of those who make the least – especially when you consider CEO salaries and how very little trickledown that has to the workers) should NOT be getting even more breaks.

Obama’s plan makes complete sense to me. Tax the well-off a bit more. Thereby, you will have the money for more education, healthcare, and energy independence. I guess, I also have very little problem with government involvement and some moves towards socialism. I think that a free capitalist economy will always be oppressive to some and inordinately rewards others. There need to be checks and balances – I value equality more than freedom. (and that’s what mkes me a liberal! and proud of it!)

In the debate however, Obama kept getting caught in dealing with McCain’s taxes and earmarks and could have spent more time articulating his own policies… i guess that will have to wait for the economy debate… ALTHOUGH – he did a much better job of responding to the idea that the economy and foreign policy are innately linked. I don’t think that McCain really did that at all.

McCain – D, Obama – B

International Relations
McCain is very well traveled. He has met many people in the world and understands the problems of the world. But to be honest, I understand things very differently. McCain sees the world in black and white, good guys and bad guys (all the more evidenced by Sarah Palin’s response to whether or not we should second guess Israel… if you haven’t seen it – gasp!). I simply do not see the world that way and it scares me to have another person in the white house who does.

Obama on the other hand is willing to sit down at a table with someone and have a conversation. And I respect that. It is the type of leadership that our country needs if we are to regain our standing in the world. And he also is fairly well traveled and the international community seems to respect him.

I think that the most telling indication of how each of these men would respond in meetings with people they don’t agree with in the world was the way they debated. McCain refused to LOOK at Obama or address him directly. Obama continually spoke directly to McCain, affirmed the parts of McCain’s argument that he could agree with and then proceeded to show how they were different.

McCain – C, Obama – A

Overall Grade: McCain C-, Obama B

fighting global poverty and the presidential debates

Only two questions about global poverty have been asked in the history of modern presidential debates.

It’s a shocking figure and in 2008, we need debate moderator Jim Lehrer to ask John McCain and Barack Obama “Just ONE question” on their plans to fight global poverty.

I just took action with the ONE Campaign and you can too, here:

One.org

Lectionary Leanings


I’m beginning a sort of series at the church – each week is one way that we are called to be the church.

I’m tying in very loosly “I Am who I am” with “Who do you say that I am” from last week and the fact that although Peter gets that Jesus is the Messiah, he doesn’t fully understand what it means.

Our word this week is “Accept” – it’s not enough to have the right answer to the question, we have to live out our belief that Jesus is the Messiah and that the God who wouldn’t even give us a name is the one who tenderly holds our lives in the palm of her hand.

Living it out is a lot different than just saying it. I think that’s why Peter had such a hard time… he wanted to follow a Messiah who would save him here and now, who would elevate him, who would give them liberty without the struggle. And to be honest, that’s how we have painted Jesus in our culture today – just say these simple words and believe.

But Romans tells us how we have to live – what embodying and truly accepting “You are the Messiah” means for our lives.

Last night, Michelle Obama said these words in her speech: “They’ll tell them how this time we listened to our hopes, instead of our fears. How this time, we decided to stop doubting and to start dreaming.” It’s a different context, but I think the words apply. We have to stop being afraid of what will happen to us if we truly follow Christ and we have to have hope that if we truly follow Christ, amazing things will happen and the world will be transformed.

That’s where I’m going…

glued to the tv

so, for the last two weeks I’ve spent time watching the olympics and now I’m glued to the television watching the democratic national convention. This isn’t a pulpit, so i’m going to take the liberty to share some of my political views =)

i was amazed tonight to see Senator Harkin and former Representative Leech from Iowa standing up there together. I grew up in a family that was full of Republicans, it was all I really knew. And they always talked about Leech – how he was the good guy and Harkin was the bad guy (that’s oversimplifying, but when your 12 that’s how you understand it).

Since then, I changed my own views as I grew up and started to think for myself. I came home and didn’t feel like I could really express myself, at least around my family. I’ve been a big fan of Obama since I first began to hear him speak years ago. And I was very excited by his decision to run for president, mostly because of the values that he is talking about as he talks about change: hope – the belief that dreams can come true, that change can really happen; unity – that we have to work together and listen to one another in order to make things happen; and a grassroots sensibility – that it takes all of us, each and every single one of us to be the kind of country that we dream of.

I was so excited to see those two congressmen stand up there and say that this is not a red or blue issue, but a red, white and blue issue – what is best for our country. It has been great to hear all sorts of ordinary people speaking tonight about how they found the ability to dream again, they found hope again, and as a Christian, I don’t believe that hope is a trite thing.

btw… Michelle Obama’s speech was amazing.

budget hero

I found this site which allows you to make your own governmental budget priorites. Evidently, I did pretty good – well, at least with my own values. My three priorities were “health and wellness”, “green”, and “government efficiency” I not only extended the budget bust from 2035 to 2070+, but I limited the size of government and reduced the debt from 37.7% of the GDP to 7.3%!

Play Budget Hero

Priorities

This morning’s gospel passage is not one of those that tend to make us all warm and fuzzy inside. On the surface, it appears to offer no real “good news” at all.

But that is because the gospels have this fantastic ability to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable all at the same time. To those who are facing persecution and pressure because of their faith – this passage from Matthew offers encouragement, and offers hope – it is a reminder that while those around them might be able to destroy their bodies, their lives in the fullest sense, rest with God and not man. Jesus tells those who are persecuted three times in this passage to not be afraid. As our missionaries minister to people in China, a place where there are real persecutions because of the name of the Lord, this message is one of comfort.

But here in the United States, we don’t typically face that kind of conflict. As much as we hear it being lamented on television these days, Christianity really isn’t under attack in this nation. There are isolated instances where someone is forced to confess or deny their faith under threat of death, like the young woman whose admitted faith in Christ propelled another young man to kill her in the Columbine shootings. And those events stay with us – but they are not our daily experience.

Brian Stoffregen is a Lutheran pastor in Arizona and in his weekly reflections upon the scripture, he brought these questions forward: “Does the lack of opposition to our faith mean that it is strong or that it is weak? … If we aren’t suffering in some way, why not? Is it because we are surrounded by people who are already in Jesus’ “household,” or because we are failing to be witnesses?”

Let me repeat that: is it because we are surrounded by people who are already in Jesus’ “household” or because we are failing to be witnesses?

I think the answer to that question is both. We are not daily facing persecution because we are both surrounded by people who are already “in” and because we fail to be witnesses.

For a long time, we have thought of ourselves as a Christian nation. There is a strong Judeo-Christian ethic and language that is used in politics and government and in the culture in general.

In these last few decades however, that unity between Christians and the nation has started to unravel a bit. The United States today is one of the biggest mission fields in the world with many who are not only unchurched, but to whom church is a strange and scary place. And the alliances between various flavors of Christianity and political parties is beginning to dissolve as many evangelicals find themselves looking at both moral and social issues.

While many people are feeling very anxious about this separation, about being one religious group among many, about not having the “in” with the state, I for one, am celebrating. I cherish our separation between church and state, not only in politics, but also in our schools, and in the various other places where the state and church act together – and it’s for a very simple reason: I don’t trust the state to do church.

When the state or government and the church are in bed together, things get complicated. You suddenly have multiple duties’ pulling you this way and that, and I think in the end, the church loses. We lose precisely because of this passage from Matthew this morning – we lose because we are already surrounded by people who are supposedly “in” and we also fail to be witnesses – we let the state tell us what to believe and we lose our prophetic voice.

Above all, we get confused about who we are serving.

At the very beginning of this passage from Matthew we find ourselves in the midst of a discussion about servants and masters, disciples and slaves… the question being asked of disciples in Matthew’s community, in Matthew’s time would have been: Whom do you serve? It is a question that is very pointed, very direct and gets us to the heart of the problem.

As we wrestle with that question today, I want us to really think about it personally. And as we start to do so, we need to think about the multiple things that demand time and energy and commitment from us.

At the end of each set of rows, there is a pad of paper and some pencils or pens. Take one of these and pass them down the row and then I want us to take some time to really think about the five things in your life right now that you are called to be faithful to – that demand something of your life. They may be things like your job, your family, the country… or something much more specific to your calling. What are the things that you feel like you have some responsibility to in this world? Write them down and then order them 1-5, with 1 being the thing that is the most important to you.

(5 minutes)

I don’t know about you, but writing down those things was extremely difficult – and tiresome. There are so many things that demand something from us and I think that most of us, most of the time, feel stretched and pulled in so many different directions that it is hard to know which way is up. It is hard to know which is the most important and it seems to change with the circumstance.

We are all here this morning, however, because of a shared commitment to follow God and to follow Christ. Let me just cut straight to the point and ask how many of you have God or Jesus on that list of five things?

This morning’s scripture is about allegiances, it’s about priorities, and it’s also about what happens when those priorities conflict.

Matthew was writing to a community that followed Christ, and they did so at their own peril. Day after day, they kept getting into trouble for the same kinds of things that Jesus did – because they were trying to live out the Kingdom of God in the face of a different kind of kingdom.

Sarah Dylan Bruer writes:

“They believed that only God could claim the kind of power over others that so many [like the Emperor, the family patriarch, the slave owner had taken] — and so they proclaimed Jesus’ teaching, “Call no one father on earth, for you have one father — the one in heaven” (Matthew 23:9). Their belief that God was calling every person — male and female, slave and free, of every nation — led them the build a community in which women and slaves were received as human beings with agency to make their own decisions and gifts to offer the community — and they didn’t ask anyone’s husband, father, or owner for permission to do so. They built pockets of community living into a radical new order that looked more like chaos to many onlookers, and that threatened to undermine the order of the Empire. And so their neighbors, their friends, and sometimes their own family turned them in, hauling them before governors as agitators, to be flogged, or worse.”

In their attempts to follow Christ faithfully, to make that allegiance the first priority in their lives, they came into conflict with the Empire and their roles as citizens, and they came into conflict with their families. But they were clear as to which of those things were the most important, and they were willing to sacrifice, even their own lives to be faithful to Christ.

In my own experience, these kinds of conflicts are messy and painful. In March of 2003, our country started to go to war with Iraq and I was a naïve college student. I kept thinking about all of those things that I had learned from Jesus and felt deep in my bones that this military venture was wrong. And in conversations with my roommates and other friends, we all found ourselves similarly moved. Matthew 10:27 reads “what I say to you in the dark, tell in the light; and what you hear whispered, proclaim from the housetops.”

And so, as Christians, we stood in opposition to the war. We kept coming back to the notion that all human beings were children of God, the hairs on all of our heads are numbered and we are all valuable in God’s eyes. If that was true, any life lost, was something to be mourned. A group of us got together and began to erect crosses on the lawn in front of the chapel – as a reminder that there was a real human price to this conflict.

The morning after the crosses had all been put up, we walked onto campus to see one of the most painful things I have ever experienced. The crosses were torn down, many broken apart, and some of the broken pieces were used to spell out “God Bless the USA”

That day, I learned how messy our priorities can be. I learned what happens when we start to equate something like patriotism with faithfulness to God. And I also learned how important it was to be clear on who you serve.

Our campus was torn in two that semester. We learned what it meant that Christ brings a sword not peace. The truth is that we are faced with a choice and that we must choose who we will serve. We must choose which one of those things that pull on us, and that we love, which of those things that are in and of themselves good, which one will be the guiding force for everything else.

And it will cause conflict. Any of you who have chose at one time or another to put your family before your job knows what a strain that puts on work relationships, or vice versa. Priorities and allegiances matter. Who we serve matters. But Christ tells us that if we chose to serve him. If we chose to be known as his followers, then we are in the palm of God’s hand. We should not be afraid, because we have life in Christ. We will find our lives and our fullness, when we follow him.

It will not be easy. And it doesn’t mean that we give up everything else. It means that when we make our relationship with Christ our first priority, all of those other relationships change, and we learn how to witness, we learn how to love, and we learn how to truly live God’s kingdom in this world. Do not be afraid and follow him. Amen, and amen.